11.8 C
New York
Sunday, May 9, 2021
HomeTrendsBootstrapping Vs Funding: Here is our story

Bootstrapping Vs Funding: Here is our story

This is a special month. We finally turned profit after 18 months of launching CutShort. A proud and important moment for a bootstrapped startup like us.

Looking back, when we decided to bootstrap back in 2015, it was not a common thing to do. Every other startup was raising money as early as possible. But things have changed in recent months. Investors have now become more selective and having seen the recent debacles at over-funded startups (e.g. Housing or PepperTap), more founders are at least considering the option of bootstrapping more seriously.

So this seems like a good time to reflect on our story of bootstrapping CutShort to first profit.

Why did we choose to bootstrap?

We wrote a blog post detailing this. But in a nutshell, we prioritized achieving product-market fit over anything else. And we figured we didn’t need a ton of money to do that .

Also, we wanted to avoid any distraction at that early stage. We had figured a problem and had some solution hypotheses that we had validated with some target users. With just 2 people on team, we could have started talking to investors based on our early hypotheses OR we could have instead built the product to validate them. Yes, the investors could have given some valuable advice, but at that early stage we just didn’t know which advice to keep and which one to pass on. It just made more sense to listen to our target users.

Later, we also learned about how the incentives of investors can diverge from those of the founders (read this article to know more). To illustrate this point, a couple of investors who called us up early advised to avoid building a two sided marketplace and instead build just the technology that could work off existing data from the internet. It made natural sense to them as investors – acquiring a critical mass of users can be costly and slow. But going that route would have kept us from controlling the entire user experience and collecting the right data to yield great results to our users. Our competitors who took that advice (and had raised millions) actually didn’t survive for long.

READ  Develop your innovation partnerships the same way you build your products
READ  Roku’s update adds support for Spanish voice commands, visual search results and more

Bootstrapping vs Funding: It’s like taking stairs vs elevator

The more I think, the more I feel that bootstrapping is like taking stairs while funding is like riding a fast elevator. With stairs, if you lose direction, you can change course midway. If you have taken the wrong staircase, you can backtrack or even start climbing a different building. All this working up and down the stairs also makes your team stronger and builds a fighting character.

With funding, you travel way faster. But with a bigger team size and a committed path to investors, you better know the exact direction you are traveling in. Yes, you can change directions (aka “pivots”) but those won’t come cheap any longer.

Looking back, we took the stairs since the ability to experiment was important to us. We started with a specific idea about “referral hiring” but realized we needed to build a critical mass first. While doing that, we discovered new unsolved issues that we began to solve. Along side, we freely experimented to solve some other problems in adjacent markets. The result of this free experimentation was creation of better product and a rugged team that got the experience of taking ideas to execution multiple times.

Bootstrapping also helped in two more things. First, it forced us to be more innovative in marketing. We couldn’t just throw money on ads — we had to find new ways of reaching our users. Second, it also made us careful about over-hiring. Unlike startups that go on a hiring spree as soon as they raise funds, we did the reverse. We tried to avoid hiring at all by multitasking and automating our tasks as much as possible. We discovered this great advice by Henry Ward, CEO of eShares, in this great post:

 Hiring is not a consequence of success. Revenue and customers are. Hiring is a consequence of our failure to create enough leverage to grow on our own.  Starting with me, every human thereafter is overhead.

We started seeing the truth that adding each person on the team had to deliver 2X value to justify the increase in our overheads. And in cases we hired, we offered deliberately lower salaries to attract only the people who genuinely believed in our idea and our team.

READ  Roku’s update adds support for Spanish voice commands, visual search results and more
READ  Israel, India partners in the quest for future with low carbon, pollution levels: Netanyahu

Caveat: Bootstrapping has some serious issues too

There are several disadvantages of bootstrapping too. The obvious one is the lack of money to hire smart people to scale faster. The second one is lack of credibility in the market. The net effect — bootstrapping can slow you down.

The first one — lack of money to hire — can sometimes be turned into an opportunity. As I described above, not having VC dollars forced us to hire people who were not motivated by money, but by a higher purpose of building a great product and an inspiring startup. We passed on the people who seemingly liked our idea, but just couldn’t give up their “market” salaries.

The second disadvantage can be a big issue – difficulty in establishing our credibility. Funded startups simply command much more respect. They are loved by the media, chased by the talent, admired by the customers and trusted by the partners. They find less friction.

On the other hand, despite having a nice product and great traction, we always had to fight harder. While funded startups got free publicity, we had to be extra creative and convincing to get featured in the media. Ditto with partnerships — it took us longer for people to see us as credible partners.

The summary — if getting PR, striking partnerships and winning big deals early is crucial to your success, bootstrapping can be detrimental to your startup.

Two prerequisites of bootstrapping

As we called out in our blog too, we had two unique advantages that let us bootstrap. First, we were in a money rich market. Hiring talent has been an established need and companies are accustomed to paying thousands of dollars on it. If you are trying to solve a new problem OR your users have never paid for a solution before, your path to revenues might be more challenging. In such markets, pushing for revenues prematurely will drastically slow down your growth.

READ  New funding round values catering marketplace Hungry at $100M+

Second, our team was incredibly lean and cross functional. For most time, we just had 3 full time members who pulled the weight of our entire development, marketing & support operations. If you need to hire more employees and pay them market salaries, your costs will be much higher.

READ  Wunderlist’s founders just raised $19M to build an online presentation tool

What’s next?

Yes, this is a proud moment. It’s liberating to know that we won’t need to seed our bank account for outgoing expenses next month.

But we realized that this is only the first milestone. There is ton of work ahead of us to call ourselves successful in any way. Scaling our user base, product and team isn’t going to be easy. Alongside, we need to keep an eye on our burn and keep increasing our revenues to stay financially robust.

The first milestone took 24 months. We definitely believe our next few milestones will come about faster.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

%d bloggers like this: