Revealing the Actual Cause Behind Prince Harry’s ‘Lost’ Title Amidst Royal Website’s Controversial Slip
Three years after the 2020 ‘Megxit’ agreement, and just a day after the British daily Express pointed out a significant error on the official royal website, notable changes have been made to Prince Harry’s title and his ‘position’ within the royal family. The correction has been implemented on the official website, rectifying the inaccuracies that had been highlighted, potentially signaling a broader effort to accurately reflect Prince Harry’s current standing and role within the royal hierarchy. This adjustment reflects the ongoing intricacies and developments within the British royal family, as well as the public’s keen interest in accurate and up-to-date information regarding its members.
Over the course of the past three years, there has been a consistent oversight on the official royal website in referring to the Duke of Sussex as “His Royal Highness,” despite Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to renounce their HRH titles. This discrepancy persisted across various instances, casting a shadow over their non-working member status within the Royal Family. The unequivocal statement released on January 18, 2020, distinctly announced that ‘The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the Royal Family,’ marking a clear departure from their previous roles.
This recent correction to Prince Harry’s title and position on the royal website appears to acknowledge and rectify this long-standing error. It underscores the importance of accurately reflecting the choices and status of royal family members, especially those as significant as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who have taken active steps to redefine their relationship with the monarchy.
The recent rectification has appropriately removed the ‘His Royal Highness’ title from Prince Harry’s name on the official royal website. What is noteworthy is that despite the necessary amendments, the website had consistently maintained the reference to Prince Harry as HRH for a period spanning over three years.
This extended duration of inaccurate representation underscores the significance of this correction, as it aligns with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to relinquish their HRH titles and redefine their roles within the Royal Family. The correction not only addresses an oversight but also reflects the evolving dynamics of the British monarchy and the clarity with which they intend to present their members’ positions and titles to the public.
Beyond the alteration of his royal title, the recent revision also encompasses a shift in Prince Harry’s positioning within the royal family hierarchy. Notably, his profile page has undergone a repositioning that is indicative of his altered status. In a notable change, his profile now appears further down the list, even below the profiles of active members of the royal family. This deliberate demotion of his profile’s placement is emblematic of the evolving dynamics within the monarchy and Prince Harry’s distinct position as a non-working member.
By placing his profile lower on the list, the royal website seems to symbolize the acknowledgment of his choice to step back from his previous roles and responsibilities. This adjustment could reflect the intention to accurately portray his role in line with the choices he and Meghan Markle have made, while also aligning with the broader reevaluation of the royal family’s structure and public representation.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s profile pages have undergone a noticeable rearrangement, now positioned in close proximity to each other, and situated below the profiles of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester as well as Princess Alexandra. This spatial reordering reflects their transition to a different status within the royal family. By placing their pages adjacent to each other and below other members, the website emphasizes their distinctive role as non-active members of the family, juxtaposed against those who continue to undertake official duties.
A significant observation is the positioning of Prince Andrew’s page, which now occupies the bottommost rung of the page hierarchy. This particular placement is likely in response to the ongoing controversies surrounding Prince Andrew and his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The rearrangement of profiles underscores a purposeful effort to portray the shifting dynamics within the royal family, reflecting both the changes in roles and the response to public perception. The revised hierarchy thus offers a visual representation of the evolving landscape of the British monarchy.
In response to the recent adjustments on the Royal Family website, Buckingham Palace conveyed in a statement reported by Express that the website encompasses an extensive repository of more than five thousand pages of information, encompassing various aspects of the Royal Family’s life and engagements.
Following the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, there has been an ongoing effort to revisit and refresh the content, resulting in periodic updates. Acknowledging that certain portions of the content may still be outdated as this revisiting process continues, the statement implies that these recent revisions are part of a broader endeavor to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the website’s information in light of recent developments within the royal family.
The modifications made to Prince Harry’s profile encompass more than just his title and position within the royal family. An additional change involves the correction of his reference as the youngest son of the Prince of Wales, which erroneously implied a comparison to five-year-old Prince Louis. The corrected version now accurately describes him as ‘The Duke of Sussex is fifth in line to the throne and the younger son of The King and Diana, Princess of Wales.’
This update rectifies a factual inaccuracy and appropriately places Prince Harry in the context of his actual position within the royal lineage, acknowledging his role as the younger son of The King and Diana, Princess of Wales. These revisions reflect a commitment to maintaining accurate and up-to-date information on the official website, aligning with the evolving status and roles of the royal family members.
