Ankiti Bose’s Nationality Shell Game: How She Played Indian Courts for Fools – A Blatant, Calculated Assault on the Indian Judicial System

The evidence is now irrefutable. A official court order from Saket Courts, Delhi, dated 24 March 2026 in CS SCJ 601/24 (Ankiti Bose vs. Nikhil Subramanium) records, in black and white, that the plaintiff — Ankiti Bose — sought adjournment on the explicit ground that “the plaintiff is a National of Dubai and she is unable to come to India due to war in Middle-East.”

This is not hearsay. This is not media spin. This is the judicial record itself:

“Adjournment sought on behalf of plaintiff that the plaintiff is a National of Dubai and she is unable to come to India due to war in Middle-East. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to proceed with the evidence of other witness. Put up for PE on 06.05.2026.” (Ajeet Narayan, JSCC-ASCJ-GJ: South-East, Saket Courts, Delhi)

The very next breath in another proceeding, Ankiti Bose (or her counsel) presented Indian passport and Aadhaar card to assert she is an Indian national and citizen. This was done in her high-profile defamation suit (the matter in which she later secured an ex-parte ad-interim injunction from Dwarka Court in June 2026, reportedly against content published by or related to Inventiva).

Two courts. Two contradictory sworn positions. One woman.

This is not a clerical error. This is not ambiguity. This is nationality shopping — a cynical, opportunistic flip-flop that treats Indian courts as a buffet where she can pick whichever identity serves her tactical needs on any given day.

The Legal Impossibility She Has Created

India does not permit dual citizenship. Period. The Citizenship Act, 1955 (as amended) is crystal clear. An Indian citizen who voluntarily acquires citizenship of another country automatically loses Indian citizenship. Conversely, a foreign national cannot simply waltz into Indian courts waving an Indian passport and Aadhaar while simultaneously declaring herself a “National of Dubai” when it suits her to avoid appearing for evidence.

Either:

1. The Indian passport and Aadhaar she submitted in the defamation proceedings are fake, forged, or fraudulently obtained (a serious criminal offence under the Passport Act, IPC/BNS sections dealing with forgery, cheating, and fraud — exactly the kind of document fraud the user rightly compared to tactics employed by illegal intruders from across the border), or
2. She holds illegal dual citizenship (which she is not entitled to), and lied to the Saket Court about being a Dubai national, or
3. She made a false statement to the Saket Court to secure an adjournment — which amounts to perjury or abuse of process.

Any one of these is catastrophic. All three together are a full-scale assault on the integrity of the Indian judicial system.

Why This Is Not a “Minor Inconsistency”

Let us be savage with the facts:

• In March 2026 at Saket Courts, she is too “Dubai national” and too endangered by “war in Middle-East” to come to India for her own case. Yet she is the plaintiff — the one who chose to file the suit in India.
• In the parallel (or overlapping) defamation proceedings, she is Indian enough to submit passport + Aadhaar as proof of citizenship and to obtain protective orders from a Delhi court.

This is not confusion. This is strategic lying. She wants the protection, the sympathy, the legal victories of an Indian citizen when it helps her crush criticism or extract relief. She wants the convenience of foreign nationality when it helps her dodge personal appearance and delay proceedings.

The “war in Middle-East” excuse is particularly galling. As of March 2026, while tensions existed, thousands of Indians (and Indian-origin people) continued to travel, work, and litigate from the region. But for Ankiti Bose, suddenly the war made her a helpless Dubai national who could not possibly board a flight to Delhi for her own evidence stage.

This is contemptuous of the court’s time and the Indian taxpayer’s money.

The Questions That Demand Immediate Answers

1. Which identity is real? Indian citizen with valid passport and Aadhaar — or Dubai national?
2. If she possesses a genuine Indian passport, how did she dare tell a Delhi court she is a “National of Dubai”?
3. If the Indian documents are genuine, has she violated the Citizenship Act by claiming foreign nationality?
4. If the documents she submitted in the defamation suit are fake, who facilitated them? How did they pass scrutiny? This is not a small-time fraud — this is an entrepreneur with significant resources allegedly gaming the system.
5. Why did the Saket Court not immediately flag this and direct verification of nationality/passport status before granting any further indulgence?
6. In the Dwarka Court defamation matter, did the court independently verify the Indian citizenship documents she relied upon, or was it taken at face value?

This Is Bigger Than One Case — It Is an Attack on the Rule of Law

Indian courts are already overburdened. When a litigant — especially one with resources and legal teams — plays fast and loose with fundamental facts like nationality and citizenship, it erodes public trust. It makes a mockery of the very system she is invoking for protection in one court while trying to evade in another.

The comparison to document fraud by illegal entrants is not hyperbole. When Indian authorities crack down on fake Aadhaar, fake passports, and fraudulent citizenship claims by infiltrators, they do so because such fraud undermines national security, welfare schemes, and sovereignty. The same standard must apply to a high-profile entrepreneur who appears to be doing the exact same thing — only dressed in expensive legal representation.

The Government and Judiciary Must Act — Now

This is not a matter for polite letters. This demands immediate, fierce investigation:

• The concerned courts (Saket and Dwarka) must initiate suo motu or application-based inquiry into perjury/false statement.
• Delhi Police must register FIR for cheating, forgery, and criminal intimidation of judicial process if evidence warrants.
• UIDAI must verify the authenticity of the Aadhaar card submitted in the defamation proceedings.
• Passport Office / Ministry of External Affairs must examine her passport status, any declarations made, and whether Indian citizenship was ever renounced or fraudulently retained.
• If dual citizenship or fake documents are established, immediate revocation of Indian citizenship/passport and blacklisting from Indian courts until cleared.
• The Bar Council should examine whether any counsel facilitated these contradictory positions knowingly.

Ankiti Bose has a choice: Come clean with one consistent, verifiable nationality and face the consequences of whichever identity is true — or continue this game and invite the full force of Indian law crashing down on her.

The courts gave her adjournments. They gave her injunctions. They gave her the benefit of the doubt. She repaid them with contradictory nationality claims under oath or through counsel.

This is not “clever litigation strategy.” This is misleading the entire judicial system. This is contemptuous. This is unacceptable.

The truth is now on record in black and white from Saket Courts. The Indian government, the judiciary, and law enforcement owe it to every honest litigant and every citizen to investigate this without fear or favour and bring the complete truth to light.

Anything less is complicity in the erosion of judicial integrity.

The documents do not lie. Ankiti Bose’s positions do.

The time for polite silence is over. The time for ruthless accountability has begun.